Would you say these names (I like all of them) are, underused, or vintage, or ready to come back, or never left… or, worst of all, are just dated enough to be ick but not ready to come back?

Be honest, I can take it. These names all have a similar feel to me, if you can think of what category to put them in, let me know. They’re not super-ultra clunky but they’re not what babies are being named that much.

Here I go…

[name_f]Sabrina[/name_f]
[name_f]Rosemary[/name_f]
[name_f]Katrina[/name_f] and [name_f]Catriona[/name_f], said the same way.
[name_f]Veronica[/name_f]
[name_f]Tabitha[/name_f]
[name_f]Lorelei[/name_f]
[name_u]Meredith[/name_u]
[name_u]Vivien[/name_u]
[name_f]Gwendolen[/name_f]
[name_f]Cecilia[/name_f]
[name_f]Naomi[/name_f]
[name_f]Gillian[/name_f]
[name_f]Caroline[/name_f]
[name_f]Imogene[/name_f] (im-oh-jean, far less nameberry-approved than [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] with the -jen sound)

Aside from the ones that are super close in sound or look like [name_f]Sabrina[/name_f] and [name_f]Katrina[/name_f], or [name_f]Gwendolen[/name_f] and [name_f]Gillian[/name_f], they all kind of work as sisters, don’t they? But what’s this style?

ncG1vNJzZmien6fCrnrNmqSempWnv7p6wqikaKxforyuec2apJ6rX2eAd4SYbg%3D%3D